[email protected] (Karl Berry) writes: > 1) Unless there's an objection to any of these people, I propose that I > will approve them in a couple days. Why not? > > 2) Unless there's an objection, I propose that list subscription be > automated. If someone hears about it and cares enough to try to > subscribe, why not? I don't see how we could know in advance if someone > was a troll. >
No objection. > 3) On the other hand, if the list is supposed to be strictly > invitation-only, then I volunteer to become the list maintainer, and > propose that such invitations be cc-d to me, and I will just subscribe > them. > I've never seen it as being so strict. > In any case, I have just set advertised=no for this list (so it won't > show on the list-of-lists web page), which (it seems to me) is how it > should have been all along, which will at least avoid future people who > just subscribe to everything available. > Thanks. -john -- John Sullivan | Executive Director, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: 61A0963B | http://status.fsf.org/johns | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at <http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=8096>.
