Forgot to copy-reply to you all. Sorry. -------- Mensagem encaminhada -------- > De: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <[email protected]> > Para: [email protected] > Assunto: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] > [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract > Data: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:21:52 -0300 > > Even by requiring the licensee to state when he adapts the original > work, that doesn't solve the fact that someone can twist the licensor > opinions without even knowing he did so. > > For example, a Brazilian (that calls himself "free software activist") > watched Richard Stallman talk on Stockholm, in January 25th, 2016 > (https://www.fsf.org/events/rms-20160125-stockholm), and published a > blog post about it (https://helio.loureiro.eng.br/). > > According to the "free software activist", Stallman "said that BSD > systems are currently free software. Maybe after discussing with Theo de > Raadt, creator of the OpenBSD system, he apparently rethought his > criteria for free software and operating systems, since he have never > said so.". And he also said that, according to Stallman, "open source > does not exist". > > Also, this "free software activist" notes that Stallman used an image of > Tux (instead of Freedo) on the presentation. Perhaps the person who did > the drawing had only black pen. I personally think it's advisable to > promote Freedo (Linux-libre) instead of Tux (Linux), since Linux is > still non-free. > > I call him "free software activist" in quotes because his blog > constantly teaches people how to use/install/fix some non-free > functional data, let alone requiring some minor non-free JavaScript.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
