Ahoj, Jaromil; On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:44:23PM +0200, Jaromil wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Ineiev wrote: > > > So far, we identified an issue with distribution channels: Uruk > > GNU/Linux has no its own repositories; Ali suggested some solution, > > but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable; I hope Ali will explain it > > here. > > can you explain why it should be an issue for an 100% free distro to > not have its own repositories?
The distro must be able to fix bugs in its packages; when they use other people's repositories (which is the case for Uruk GNU/Linux) they effectively can't do this (not directly).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
