Le jeudi 10 novembre 2016 à 9:00 -0500, Julie Marchant a écrit : [...] > If the OS just had its own website, styled differently from the > website selling the laptops to ensure that the separation is > thorough, I don't think anyone would have an objection. [...]
It _is_ "styled differently" now. That it wasn't before was a technical issue as a result of redoing the whole website (and before that, it was a technical limitation). The only thing that references Purism, besides the one-liner disclaimer at the very bottom of the page (if we didn't put that, then I'm pretty sure people would then argue that we didn't put such a disclaimer, etc. etc.), is the domain name in the browser's address bar. As Zlatan pointed out, other domain names were already taken. Anyway, as I replied in the PureOS software certification thread: There is absolutely no part of https://gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html ...that says that a distro website cannot be part of another website. So your argument stands only on your personal opinion. Please take the time to read my full reply there: lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-11/msg00033.html
