André Silva <emulator...@riseup.net> writes: > Hi guys, since Chromium is blacklisted as nonfree software [0] we have a > serious issue. KDE is migrating their apps to QTWebEngine which contains > Chromium as the embed engine inside it. [1] > > Blacklisting it could be a solution, however since it's an engine, a lot > of packages won't work without it and it will require a large task to > remove the entire QT/KDE framework. > > What do you think is the best solution to this problem? > > I feel that Chromium is nonfree and presents privacy risks due to > outstanding issues. > > [0]:https://www.libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines#chromium-browser > [1]:https://labs.parabola.nu/issues/1167
wasn't chromium considered non libre because of some source files' licenses being proprietary? that license review was made years ago, maybe the situation changed? -- :>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
