Hello, Although this ticket only makes unsupported statements, the OP may have a point.
Should a distro that hasn't been maintained for several years be listed in free-distros.html, especially if it is based on a major distro which itself isn't maintained anymore? I am thinking of Blag, based on Fedora 10 (2010). Conversely, if unmaintained distros are listed, is there any good reason not to list a new one, which clearly is actively maintained (Uruk)? Best regards, Thérèse Le Dim 31 Déc 2017 15:50:11, [email protected] a écrit : > > BLAG is inactive > > Dragora GNU Linux-Libre is inactive > > Dynebolic is inactive > > Musix is inactive > > happy a new year >
