On 05/12/2018 10:17 AM, Benoît wrote: > let me know if you > want me to copy the comments here and for the future comments to put the > details here instead of the template?
yes, i think it is for the benefit of all subscribers to watch the progress that all information should be posted here before being finalized in the checklist - for example, what files or ares were reviewed and what were the findings - the idea of the checklist is very much secondary and any information it contains to be very brief - perhaps linking back to discussions here if need be the idea is that the checklist and its notes would remain as a resource for future readers only in cases where the distro still has issues that remain to be resolved; because searching the mailing list is tedious - but once a distro is accepted, there is probably little future interest in the details of the review process
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
