to be clear about this criteria as i understand it - it is almost entirely concerned with the name of the distro itself - to avoid the distro being confused as being associated with or endorsed by some other distro (such as if the distro were named: "arch-libre" or "slackware-free") - the name "hyperbola" clearly passes this test on the face of it - this is not about "linux" or any other constituent software
most nomenclature issues fall under the "avoiding propaganda and confusion" - with that one i can also fully agree without hesitation that hyperbola passes - ive read most of the hyperbola wiki and i can say that hyperbola's attention to nomenclature exceeds the FSDG requirement
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
