On 13/05/18 09:13, Jean Louis wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 09:03:33AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote: >> On 12/05/18 17:49, Benoît wrote: >> >>> # Other "Information for practical use" under a free license >>> NOTES: Hyperbola contains in the amendments "Hyperbola is free software" >>> and "Hyperbola is free culture" from its social contract [1] the commitment >>> to not include or recommend non-free software or documentation. >> >> If Hyperbola is Free Culture then it won't be including the Emacs manual >> nor the GCC manual nor anything else under GFDL with "invariant sections". >> >> For more information see >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-culture_movement#Skepticism_from_the_FSF
> In that sense, with respect to opinions, I do not > see why Hyperbola cannot be free culture and > include the Emacs Manual and GCC manual and GFDL > with invariant sections. Because they are not under Free Culture licences, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_Free_Cultural_Works No need to re-go through the arguments, the FSF simple don't believe that all their (or anyone else's) works should be under Free Culture licences and it is isn't a requirement of the FSDG. Ask the FSF if you don't believe me. M. -- FSF member #9429 http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=9429 http://www.fsf.org/about "The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom and to defend the rights of all free software users."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
