Benoît - it seems that the impression you took of my suggestion for splitting the criteria into separate threads was to only discuss one issue criteria at a time and then wait for a conclusion before moving on to the next criteria - i only meant that separate threads make the discussions more clear and focussed - multiple threads could be going at once and people could comment to each one by name even if several months in the future without losing track of the discussion
at this moment today there is not as much participation here as in previous months and these first two criteria were discussed only briefly - some of these criteria will be much more time consuming than others and people may have things to add on different topics at different times; so it is better to have all topics remain open for discussion - thats not to say that you cant set the check mark there now if you did a fairly thorough review and nothing blatant was found; but none should be declared as "closed" or "final" until the entire process is complete - new evidence and discussions could always arise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
