On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 20:34:41 -0700 Theodore Somers <knowledgeofnati...@outlook.com> wrote:
> By only serving the GNU system (mostly in the form of GNU/Linux), the > directory [here it refers to the free software directory] is > effectively discouraging the development of other potential fully > free/libre operating systems. While I think that it would be a good thing to be able to use the directory for more things than just software that runs on GNU/Linux if it doesn't increase the work of current contributors / maintainers, I don't think that the directory itself has a huge impact on the development of FSDG compliant distributions and/or operating systems. Though the opposite might be true: the fact that Replicant exists and that it's FSDG compliant seems to at least have some influence on the discussions about adding applications that don't run on GNU/Linux or GNU/Hurd in the directory. In any case I think that it's a good idea to have more FSDG distributions and operating systems in order to cover more use cases, especially the ones that are currently covered by non-FSDG distributions / operating systems and that are not yet covered by the FSDG ones. > The FSF as a whole also mostly promotes the GNU system and doesn't > encourage development outside of that and replicant. Long time ago, ReactOS was in the list of operating systems that were FSDG compliant. However, at some point, it was found that they provided nonfree software in their package manager system. The discussions about that where a bit complicated because their package manager didn't work in the same way than GNU/Linux package manager do, so that did lead some incomprehension along the way. > That leaves out other paradigms for how an OS could work outside of > the traditional unix and unix-like abstraction/paradigm. That leaves > out a lot of potential design space. It could also be easier for > users of OSes that are not unix-like to migrate to a fully free OS if > there was one more similar to their old OS in how it functioned. I think also having FSDG compliant distributions and OS would help with that. For instance with HURD (that has a different design than GNU/Linux), we already have 1 FSDG compliant distribution (Guix) that has support for HURD alongside GNU/Linux, in the exact same branch, manuals, repositories, etc. Though HURD is currently experimental in Guix. It might also be interesting to have some FSDG certification for different execution environments too. For instance software like Libreboot can run programs through GRUB and also have strong freedom commitment. This could probably fit well in a "Small non-GNU distros" category, especially because they are not self-hosted. Programming languages also have package managers nowadays, so it might be a good idea to also have FSDG compliant languages packages managers and repositories as this way it would put the burden on the community maintaining these package managers instead of duplicating that work in every FSDG distributions packaging them. Denis.
pgpXuudRgOMCD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
