On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:16:59 +0200 Denis wrote:
> bad quality free software will tend to use it anyway. 

that is always an option - anyone can grab 'pip' or whatever from same repo
maintainers where the hundreds of other bad software they want to use will be
downloaded from - if 'pip' is not in the distro repos, it is only one more
non-distro package to install, before installing the hundreds of others which
is it's only purpose


On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:16:59 +0200 Denis wrote:
> I also don't see how they could be forbidden by the FSDG if they follow
> the FSDG.

i was not suggesting that any distro should exclude any which are FSDG-fit,
only that i believe it is the most responsible option; and we know of only two
examples anyways which are fit - i was suggesting that all FSDG distros should
exclude the vast majority of them as they are; because they are not FSDG-fit,
unless someone _first_ does the work to fit them somehow

RMS wants to allow TPPMs to slide for a few more years - that may allow some
work to progress; but only existential crisis facing the FSDG and work-group -
maybe that would be a fine option, if there was any hope that the FSDG will be
enforceable someday

the only point of my last message is that it is not possible to convince
distros that these TPPMs, in their current form, are against the guidelines, and
therefore to remove them and/or help to liberate them - surely they would have
reached that conclusion on their own by now - we must consider that question as
essential; because today, distros are not obligated to follow the FSDG in any
way

i would not want to obligate anyone to help do the work; but it would be
nearly impossible even to suggest it, if there is no obligation to follow the
FSDG in the first place, nor any consequences of ignoring pleas to follow it in
the last place

then furthermore, if something can be done to liberate them, how to convince the
distros which refused to remove them, to use the liberated versions instead,
rather than continuing to distribute the unfit versions forever - because
surely at that point, even if all TPPMs were allowed temporarily pending a
solution, once a solution exists, it should then be mandatory to exclude the
unfit versions - i am fairly certain that some distros would still refuse to
comply; so we may as well start addressing that now

and so finally, that i am reluctant to do any of that work, until i can see a
complete clear path to the goal; because i have no interest in TPPMs otherwise
- "the goal" is not to liberate TPPMs for who knows what reason - the goal is to
convince FSDG distro to follow the guidelines; so that liberated TPPMs would be
interesting to distros wanting to keep the TPPMs

Reply via email to