Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://gl.scofacts.org/gl-20031214210634851.html > > Moglen: "Because the GPL does not require any promises in return > from licensees, it does not need contract enforcement in order to > work. A GPL licensor doesn't say in the event of trouble "But, > judge, the licensee promised me he wouldn't do what he's doing now." > The licensor plaintiff says 'Judge, the defendant is redistributing > my copyrighted work without permission.'" > > And the defendant says "17 USC 109, Judge." Judge: Case closed. > > Heck, what is so hard to understand here?
Tell that to the courts. Copyright does not grant you permission to redistribute stolen goods. Before you gain any rights to copies, you have to legally acquire them, and that usually entails agreeing to the conditions of the party providing you with them. What is so hard to understand here? There is lots of downloadable software around with restrictions on use and redistribution: AFPL, shareware, even MS-EULA-ware. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
