Isaac wrote: [... IPC ...]
> I don't think that makes a lot of sense from a copyright law > standpoint. It makes as much sense as this silliness: http://web.novalis.org/talks/compliance-for-developers/slide-49.html [begin textual copying] July 27, 2004 GPL Compliance for Software Developers Legal notes ---------------------------------------------------------------- Legal notes Static linking creates a derivative work through textual copying Most dynamic linking cases involve distributing the library Still a derivative work: Dynamic linking Distributing only the executable (testtriangle) Still a derivative work: Distributing the source code of software which links to a library when that library is the only software to provide that interface ----------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2004, Free Software Foundation. Verbatim copying permitted provided this notice is preserved. [end textual copying] Tough law they have over there in the GNU Republic, so to speak. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
