On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 00:01 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > http://lists.essential.org/upd-discuss/msg00137.html > > <quote author=RMS> > > The crucial point is that when we release a program under the GPL, > we do not claim that all possessors of a copy have agreed to any > contract with us. > > </quote>
The GPL is not a contract. It is an unilateral grant of rights, some of which are restricted. There's no "other party" under the GPL to agree with something. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
