Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 18 Aug 2005 15:17:12 -0400, Bruce Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The U.S. Copyright office agrees with me: > > http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.html#examples > > > > "Sound recording (long-playing record in which two of the > > 10 selections were previously published on a 45 rpm single)" > > I think they are saying that the 10 song compilation is derivative > of the original 2 song compilation and not that the individual > selections copied unto the LP have become derivative works of the > individual selections on the single.
Did I say something earlier that made it sound like I thought original works become derivative works in and of themselves? I certainly didn't intend to. I'm only refuting the assertion that if no lines of program code are modified, it necessarily follows that there is no derivative work. In this example, nobody modified a single note of the original music. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
