Isaac wrote: [...] > Where I think he's completely out to lunch is in his interpretation of > first sale.
Once again: I'm in good company. http://google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] <quote authors=Jeffrey Siegal, Isaac> :What about the first sale doctrine? Indeed, if users own their own :copies, including binary copies, of the software, than those users can :transfer those copies without complying with the GPL's requirements as :to source code access. Interesting. I really hadn't thought about that and my attempts to digest the implications on the fly are making my head hurt. I can't resolve the problems introduced by first sale without either making the user of GPL'd code a non owner or deciding that users really can transfer their copies, no matter what the GPL says. </quote> regards, alexander. -- http://google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
