> No class is needed to know why removing freedom is immoral. You have a > very serious problem if you don't instinctively know that.
Well if removing someones freedom is to my benefit why shouldn't I partake in it? > The only other commonly acceptable (and even that is debatable) form of > removing freedom is when criminals are sentenced to jail, that is, as a > punishment for doing something very bad. What about not being free to kill someone, rape someone, speed, steal a car, etc...? > Enjoying the freedom to help your neighbour by giving him a copy of > something should not be discouraged nor punished. Well can't your neighbor just go buy a copy for himself just like you did? I mean where is the real issue with this? _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
