On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:43:43 +0100 "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this case, it seems that I and the FSF disagree. Prohibiting staff > from distributing free software is the same as a NDA, in my opinion. No, it is circumscribing what they can do as agents of the company, with the property of the company. One very important issue is limiting liability. Whereas there would be few issues with distributing copies of unmodified free software, any modifications commissioned by the company could engage its liability. > And I think it is a weird stance from the FSF to support such > practises. There happens to be solid realism in most of the FSF stances. -- Stefaan -- As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning, and meaningful statements lose precision. -- Lotfi Zadeh _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
