-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There can only be what the copyright holder decides the "source" code >to be. If there's nothing left but the binary, then obviously the GPL >makes little sense; any license that permits distribution of the >program would be equally effective.
I'm not aware of any other licences that prohibit further restrictions on downstream recipients. As a more or less kind-hearted head of an otherwise evil empire, you might be willing to give away your abandonware, but unwilling to allow others to turn your product back into a proprietary mini-monopoly. - -- I have neither the need, the time, or the inclination to put words into your mouth. You are perfectly capable of damaging your reputation without any help from me. --Richard Heathfield roasts a troll in comp.lang.c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/ iD8DBQFEAw4ewyMv24BBd/gRAmP+AJ9oeUWd+LGCSJ5fCYuVjbMiaCM3HQCgoXbR hk8GQUg7Y23SQ+7kmYUMP1M= =DPfp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
