> He also has to show that the GPL actually sets a fixed price of > zero (or anything else for that matter) for a work.
[...] please read the GPL 2 b). Yes, lets. "You must cause any work that you distribute or publish", since the work hasn't been distributed to you yet, so I am quite free to charge you a bazillion zorkmoids to actually distribute it to you, Section 1: "You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.". I could go on about this specific paragraph, but this suffices to prove that the GPL does not set the price to zero, or anything else for a work which is licensed under the GNU GPL. Oh, Ah, BTW, just in case***, I'll give you ninety-five percent of profits if you drop me a link to negatively priced GPL'd stuff. I have no clue what you are talking about. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
