> You may NOT replace the MIT license > with the LGPL. Hm. I'm confused. The MIT license (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php) on the one hand says you may "sublicense" (re-license?) the code, but OTOH says, "[snip] this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software."
So, if you must include that "permission notice", does that mean the code must by definition be licensed under those terms (i.e. the MIT license)? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
