"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > > You may NOT replace the MIT license with the LGPL. > > Hm. I'm confused. The MIT license > (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php) on the one > hand says you may "sublicense" (re-license?) the code, > > Re-license means changing the license. Sub-license means adding one > or more licenses.
It means adding one or more (sub)licenseEs. I.e. another sublicense contract between a sublicensor and another (sub)licensee. And under the MIT terms. > You can sub-license a MIT licensed work under the > GPL. You can not. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
