Sex, 2006-05-12 às 17:23 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > The FSF didn't dispute that the GPL is a contract. The FSF even told the > court that "the contract controls".
That's still not the FSF but a document referenced in favour of Wallace. > ***) http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_Red_Hat_2nd_ANSWER.pdf (this case is > still pending) (...) bunch of something that's not said by the FSF and doesn't even mention "contract" (...) Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
