> No, you are wrong. Please read some basic copyright law. You > haven't even bothered opening any law codex so it is a waste of > my time to explain such basic things to you, sorry.
It's always nice to see people resulting to insults when they ran out of arguments. You know nothing about me or my (copyright law student) background. Please look up in a dictionary what constitutes an insult, and how it is different from not wanting to waste my time with quibbling with people who are to lazy to read law codexes. At least I know the difference between telling people "please make a copy of page 6" and giving them a copy. That's good enough for my professor. If it's not good enough for you, tough. Once again you confuse oranges with stones. `copy page 6' can be applied to any book/article/essay/etc that is >= 6 pages long and you will get a useful result. `Add foo at line 1, 5, 7. Remove line 7, 8, 10' cannot produce an useful result for all or even most works, it can only produce something useful for a very limited range (and that range grows smaller the more instructions you have about where to modify the work in questions), and this is clearly a deriviate since it is clearly based on a different work. That you do not actually refer to the specific parts by name is completely and utterly irrelevant. This is my last message on the subject with you. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
