"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > So in other words, the copyright on the DLL should read: (C) 200X > Auth#1, 200Y Auth#2? > > Yes, with the GNU GPL after that/those lines.
Not necessarily. Non-derivative (under copyright law, not GNU copyleft FAQ "semantics of the communication are intimate enough", etc. silliness) computer program works included in the DLL don't have to be licensed under the GPL. And DLL compilation work (i.e. aggregation of all DLL's components) also doesn't have to be licensed under the GPL as long as it is not a derivative work of some preexisting compilation under the GPL. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
