"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was answering a specific concern `code that offers a service to > > the public'. > > Which would include a copy of GNU/Linux and/or Firefox running on a > public library computer. It is not "perfectly reasonable" for anybody > but yourself to demand that the library will then consequently be > forced to hand out copies of the source code on demand. > > Not even the FSF has such a contorted view of things. > > Do you want me to ask the FSF?
You are the confused person. I have no doubt about the outcome. > If you say `yes', then I'll send the following question to legal@: > Must a library the runs a modified version of GNU Emacs provide the > source code for this modified version of GNU Emacs to the users who > use the libraries (public) system? > > If you don't like the question, feel free to rephrase it in some > manner that suits you. You could try to make it grammatical. > > Please David, learn to read instead of resorting to Terkhovian > > methods. > > Pointing out that your views are not shared by anybody else is > hardly "Terkhovian". > > Pointing out views which have no relation to my opinion about > whatever matter is Terkhovian. This wasn't about redistributing > in-house programs, it was was redistribution of _public_ programs. No, it wasn't. It was about in-house programs used for providing a public service. And your name-calling does not help in muddling your confusion. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
