David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 18 May 2006 12:48:28 +0200:
>> There is a difference between assembling a system, and developing >> its components. The FSF certainly does not develop X11. >> Neither does the FSF develop FTP, SMTP, Gopher, HTTP, .... I fail >> to see what protocols have to do with this. > The topic is the programs and libraries constituting a GNU system. And > those are to a significant degree developed by third parties and used > as components in a compilation. THIRD parties? OK, the FSF is one party, so who's the second party? Hey, isn't free software all just one big party? Or are we going to go the Groucho Marx route? "In this licence, the party of the third part shall be known as the party of the third part"; "Hey, don't like this bit either." ...... > David Kastrup -- Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter (like "aa"), remove half of them (leaving, say, "a"). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
