David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > You're arguing against a caricature of his case, and not his case > >> > itself. > >> > >> Yes, that's exactly what I say. > > > > But that caricature is of your own making. > > > > Wallace has 30 days to appeal. I hope he will. We'll see. > > Offer to pay all his legal expenses, for a small share in the > sure-fire recompensation he is about to get on appeal. I am sure this > will motivate him.
He seems to be motivated enough without any offers from me. ------- DOCKETING STATEMENT United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division File Number 1:05-cv-0678-RLY-VSS Daniel Wallace, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION; RED HAT INC; NOVELL, INC., Defendants. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3 and Circuit Rule 3 plaintiff-appellant Daniel Wallace appears and states the following: 1.) The District Court had jurisdiction over plaintiffs antitrust claim pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 26 and 28 U.S.C. §1331. 2.) The Circuit Court has jurisdiction over plaintiff-appellants claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 3.) The District Court entered final judgment on plaintiffs claim on May 16, 2006 by granting a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6). 4.) Plaintiffs notice of appeal was timely filed on May 19, 2006. __________________________________ Daniel Wallace, plaintiff-appellant pro se 3874 S. Redbird Trail New Palestine, IN 46163 317-861-6415 ------- regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
