Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Hasler wrote: >> >> Alexander Terekhov writes: >> > As for proof, "A plaintiff must prove (1) that the prices complained >> > of are below an appropriate measure of its rival's costs >> >> The marginal cost of production of copies of Linux is at most the cost of >> pressing a DVD. The marginal cost of granting a GPL license is zero. > > Wallace's case is not about copies (material objects). His case is > about predatory fix pricing of Intellectual Property in violation of > § 1 of the Sherman Act.
You can't sell "intellectual property", only access to it, by way of licenses and media. > Note that Wallace's case is an action under § 1 of the Sherman Act. It purports to be such, but fails to meet the requirements. That is why the case has been thrown out. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
