Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > David Kastrup wrote: >> > [...] >> >> "IP" is not a legal term. >> > >> > Yeah. >> > >> > http://www.fsfeurope.org/projects/ms-vs-eu/article-20060421.en.html >> > >> > <quote> >> > >> > For one thing, "intellectual property" is not a legal term that exists, >> > as such, anywhere in the world. >> > >> > </quote> >> > >> > How come that >> > >> > http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~tron/opensource/node5.html >> > >> > says >> >> Would you claim that this is the wording of a law? > > Why don't you google "No. 100-506, 102 Stat. 2538", for example?
Why should I? It won't explain what "IP" you think is being sold at cost zero. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
