Hey Ben, feel free to "mere aggregate" and distribute your non- derivative (under copyright law, not GNU copyleft FAQ silliness) GPL'd code with whatever you want.
Ben, as suggested, do not even bother reading what Alexander has to say. The GPL FAQ was written with the help by lawyers, where as Alexander doesn't even have a basic understanding of law. If you need real legal advise, please talk to a lawyer; otherwise simply read the GNU GPL and see if you are breaking any of the terms, it is quite easy to check if you do violate any terms of the license or if you are in compiliance. But once again: beware of eventual copyright impotence (penalty for copyright misuse) though. Your GPL'd code may well end up in quasi public domain. Apart from antitrust, see http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-March/004248.html As Rui Miguel Silva Seabra pointed out, Alexander likes to quote himself as if it makes his wrong advice more correct. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
