Seg, 2006-05-22 às 20:23 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > > http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/224798.htm > > > > The second decision came from a different judge in the Southern > > District of Indiana and, like the first judge and the FSF > > complaint, he found that Wallace didn't properly state a claim. > > He said he accepted the allegations as true but that Wallace > > didn't allege anticompetitive effects in an identifiable market
At least grant me the right to have facts straight... I said... Seg, 2006-05-22 às 17:30 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra escreveu: >> *sigh* I guess judges just err and err, don't they Alex? You're the >> only soldier boy saluting properly within thousands of bad performers >> in the military parade, I suppose, to your parents. I guess that really puts in a nice perspective what you replied to my email with: > The District Court is clearly in error. Predatory pricing has the > requisite anticompetitive effect (ARCO). The Appellate Court will > correct the district court's mistake. q.e.d. RUi
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
