David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> >> Linking is not aggregation. > >> > > >> > Static linking certainly is. > >> > >> Only in Terekhov-Lala-land. > > > > I gather that by virtue of some truly exciting invention static > > linking doesn't aggregate in the GNU Republic. I want the patent > > rights, dak! > > It is not mere aggregation and never was. There is also address > resolution being done, which is the whole point of linking.
I gather that in the GNU Republic, The GNU Copyleft Act has something to do with address resolution. Hey dak, would you please post some excerpts from the GNU Copyleft statute's legalese on that, thank you in advance. Just curious. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
