As long as there are proprietary libraries which comes with restrictions like "You may not use this library commercially if you don't pay me", even if you are just linking it dynamically, an "interpretion" like this is not only done by the FSF and hence not "GNU logic".
If restrictions like this are enforcable, then the GPL is enforcable too. 在 星期二 23 五月 2006 18:01，Alexander Terekhov 写道： > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] > > > While your module is not fake, the situation with regard to the > > licenses is the same. As long as your "GPLed with exception" software > > is _only_ combined with GPLed software, this would be ok. > > GNU logic. Under FSF's own interpretation, that modified "GPL with > exception" says that combined work as whole falls under "the terms > of this License", "this License" being the modified "GPL with > exception", and NOT a combination of original GPL terms + modified > GPL terms.
pgpDsSgMJbmvS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
