Unruh wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Unruh wrote:
> >[...]
> >> Yes, and you have made the comparison?
>
> >Am I claiming that "that's a derivative of GPL software appearing
> >under a BSD license"? You're suffering typical GNUish/SCOish syndrome.
>
> ??? The AFC test is a test to see whether or not there is copyright
> protected material contained withing the package.
No. It's about infringing the right on making a derivative work. IOW,
RMS' own typical "Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire
[blah blah] are permitted provided this notice is preserved" covers
compilations (packages), but not derivatives of his (kinda literary)
idiotic work(s). My, what a proprietor! (It's akin to GNUish "mere
aggregation" vs GNUish "derived" ("derived" falls under the GPL... or
else... GNUish "mere aggregation" of GNUish "derived" stuff with
something else aside for a moment).
> Have you made the
> comparixon? If not why are you telling us to look to AFC?
Because *you* have to make a (an initial) "comparixon", not me.
regards,
alexander.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
