Person's freedom is diminished rather than enlarged by limiting his right to sell his property in exchange for money (i.e. at a positive price, not "no charge").
Free software does not limit anyones right to sell software that one has written, it is in fact one of the requirements for something to be classified as free software. If you cannot use something commercially, then it is non-free software. As for your confusion of `inellectual propery' and `property' that is understandable, many people confuse it. I'd like to suggest that you read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.xhtml _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
