Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Qua, 2006-06-21 às 17:09 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: >> Note also Wallace's own (in the other case currently under appeal): >> >> ----- >> Not only competitors are harmed by the GPL scheme. Consumers lose >> because a lack of competition removes not just product choice but >> without competitive reward the incentive to improve product quality >> disappears. >> ----- >> >> http://www.terekhov.de/Wallace_v_Red_Hat_2nd_ANSWER.pdf > > That's the same Wallace whose single case was dismissed for > futility, right? Also the same Wallace whose single case included a > quote from the judge saying the exact opposite of that, right?
Not in Terekhov Lalaland. Every quote supports his views. It is just that the actual verdicts are all in error, as they don't quite jibe with Terekhov's interpretations of what has been said before. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
