David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > To quote Hollaar (http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html) > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal.computing/msg/3cf3e9ee08d2837b > > A quote which does nothing to establish the difference between license > and contract.
Intelectual property licenses are contracts. There's no "difference", stupid. Hollaar wrote: ----- (The stuff about signing the license is a little wierd, too. It's not really clear the point that is being made. Perhaps it's trying to say that since you haven't signed the license, you haven't accepted its terms yet, but will have to if you are going to perform an act that requires a permission giving in the license.) ----- I wrote: ----- Many contracts don't require signing. Google "manifestation of assent". One accepts the GPL contract by exercising exclusive right(s) granted under it. ----- http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.misc.discuss/msg/24adcd1ce9ede27d regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
