David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > That sure looks to me like a mechanism to derive acceptance > > of the GPL. > > Not really. You can't sue people to accept the license. You can only > sue them to heed it.
Only if you can establish acceptance. (And the courts won't enforce unlawful contracts -- copyright misuse, antitrust violation, etc.) > > > Not saying that makes it a contract under US common law, but this is > > a process to make people agree to the terms of the license. > > Not really. It is just pointing out to people that not having signed > anything does not make any difference with regard to having to heed > the license in case they want to make use of the rights it grants > above the default. Bzzt. You're hopeless. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
