Seg, 2006-06-26 às 17:52 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > Byron A Jeff wrote: > [...] > > I took it to mean that he started with the LGPL code base and added code > > to it. I also took it to mean that his code could not function > > independantly from the original LGPL code base. > > External factors are totally irrelevant. Copyright is about expression, > not dependencies. No MS DirectX program can function without MS DirectX > (broken and incomplete WINE stuff aside for a moment), but that doesn't > make DirectX programs derivative works of DirectX.
If they are unable to function without including DirectX in their memory segment, becoming one single program, then they _are_ in fact a derivative. It's like a book that is unreadable without adding the pages from another book. DirectX's license certainly allows linking said software with other licenses or it wouldn't be used at all. Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
