Qui, 2006-06-29 às 20:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > > Qui, 2006-06-29 Ã s 19:35 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: > > > > Downloading the same program 500 times with the purpose of distributing > > > > these copies (and which results in exactly the same situation as if one > > > > downloaded once and copied 499 times) would not result in 500 lawful > > > > copies, > > > > > > Sure it would. As for "downloaded once and copied 499 times" (in > > > alternative) it's just implied license to save bandwidth. See above. > > > > There's no such "implied license to save bandwidth". Is that a new > > "right" to be proposed at WIPO? > > Think of it as a license for your proxy servers or whatever caching on > the net. > > ----- > Implied Licenses:
(bunch a crap) Did you write it yourself? ------ > > And in the case of "end users"... > > ------ (more bunch of crap) Did you write it yourself too? Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
