Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> >> Ter, 2006-07-04 Ã s 19:17 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: >> > Q: Bzzzzt, but according to RMS, "intellectual property... is a mirage, >> > which appears to have a coherent existence only because the term >> > suggests it does." So bzzzzt, what the fuck ... !? >> > >> > A: Well, well, well. But according to one FTC commissioner (and an >> > antitrust attorney), >> >> Alex, please let me understand your reasoning: >> >> Because a text is published by some law authority like FTC "is", or >> Attoneries are, or even Judges... does that have to be taken as Official >> in the Point of View of Law? > > Consider: > > http://www.denbar.org/group/index.cfm?category=1105&EntityID=DBA > > "... > COURTESY AND CIVILITY > > 1. We will work together toward resolution of our cases by > being reasonable. > > ... > 6. We will scrupulously refrain from making misleading > statements of law or fact, whether by omission, inference > or implication." > > Moglens "license-not-a-contract" and > http://emoglen.law.columbia.edu/research-agenda.html not only > violates the standards, it warrants disbarment. I'm for free speech > and all that, but please... "Professor Of History and *GNU* Law" or > something.
Both your delusions and obsessive compulsive behavior are not pretty. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
