Stephan Kuhagen wrote: [...] > More important than that is, that at least some of my modules will > use other GPLed Libraries and Programs, so those modules have to be > GPL anyway.
Linking is irrelevant. If your modules are not derivative works of "GPLed Libraries and Programs" (seek the advice of your own legal counsel re AFC test), then I suggest that you simply go ahead with the CPL or EPL; if somebody dares to come after you claiming GPL violation (in court of law, not those empty threats and "opinions" the FSF is so fond of), you'll have a good chance to put the entire GPL code base into quasi public domain. Google "Open Source Licensing: Virus or Virtue?" and "GPL + "copyright misuse"". Show the hits to your own legal counsel. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
