David Kastrup wrote: [...] > Yes, that is what "the physical act of transferring a copy" is all
That is what 17 USC 109 is a about, stupid. Wallace wants to charge royalties for IP, not "the physical act of transferring a copy". regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
