David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> GPL because the work as a whole has to be licensed under the GPL, > > > > Man oh man. Go back to doctor, retard. Try another one. > > > > http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf > > And another long quote contradicting Alexander. Cute. Again, dearest > Alexander, like what you quoted tells you, the question is what > _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed work.
And "what _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed work", retard? Go to doctor and tell him that GNU folklore legends of A+B and "non-standardized" interfaces causing works to be considered a derivative of the GPLed work in the GNU Republic. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
