Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] > > Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was > > supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived > > from (among others) the GPLed piece. > > His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot. > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296 > > SCO: > > 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred > to as UNIX flavors. All commercial UNIX flavors in use today are > modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V > Technology (System V Technology). > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269 > > IBM: > > 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and > Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps, > manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".
Err. Buggy groklaw trascriber. http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-126-2.pdf 30. Denies the averments of paragraph 30 as they relate to IBM and Sequent or to AIX or Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develops, manufactures and markets a product under the trade name "AIX" and Sequent developed, manufactured and marketed a product under the name "Dynix/ptx". regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
