But there is no such thing as an unintentional or automatic licensing under the GPL. It may be the only _legal_ option, but it is not automatic and can't be defaulted.
You have trouble reading, I never said that or even implied it. By modifying or distributing the code you have _explicitly_ accepted the license. There is no "unintentional" or "automatic" licensening involved, you _explcitly_ accepted the license at the point where you either modified the program or distributed it. | 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not | signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to | modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. | These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this | License. Therefore, by modifying or distributing the Program | (or any work based on the Program), you indicate your | acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and | conditions for copying, distributing or modifying the Program | or works based on it. Again, please go and read the license, the only person spreading FUD here is you simplying wanting to argue about a point which we do not disagree with! _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
