David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> But you don't have all the rights to the combined work. > > > > Yeah, and here comes the GNU magic of "combined work". It's > > aggregation, idiot. > > Whether it is mere aggregation depends on the case in question. It is > certainly not possible to decide this without looking at the details, > as you wish to think.
At the details of what, retard? Here is the details: Given: object A and object B, each being original work under copyright (i.e. computer program works A and B in binary form vs source code form). Case 1: aggregation using tar. Case 2: aggregation using linker. Case 3: aggregation using ISO CD image making program. Q) Is their any "derivative work" involved here? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
