I am performing an act which is illegal unless licensed. There exists a license that says "performance of the act indicates your acceptance of the license".
It does *not* logically follow that I therefore am licensed by doing the act. You are assuming that it's impossible to do things that are illegal (forbidden). No, I'm assuming (well, not really, it is a fact) that illegal acts are illegal. Much like it is possible for someone to commit murder, or violate copyright law. There is a difference between "not allowed" and still doing it. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
